Today’s Link — Talk:Phyllis Schlafly
Also — Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles
There are a lot of biographical articles on Wikipedia about living people, and a lot of these living people are active on the Internet. This being so, I’ve long wondered when I would stumble across a biographical page (other than a vanity page, or a page about a prominent Wikipedian) where the subject of the article stops in and says hi.
Well I haven’t found it yet, but I’ve found something close: a budding edit war on the Phyllis Schlafly page, between an experienced Wikipedian and someone who identifies himself as Roger Schlafly, a relative of Phyllis (her son probably, according to Google).
Things like this apparently have happened before, because Wikipedia already has a policy strongly discouraging people from writing or editing articles about themselves. To me, though, it’s still an interesting issue. On the one hand, autobiography (and, indeed, writing about your parents) goes against the long-standing Wikipedia policies of Verifiability and, arguably, No Original Research. On the other hand, no one knows more about a person’s life than that person themselves. It makes me wonder, would the author of a book be frowned upon if they corrected an article about their book? Then why should we frown upon those who take part in the discussion of their biographical article?
I suppose ultimately the Wikipedia policies are right. Normal people can’t be NPOV about themselves, and neither can their children. But when you look at it in a certain light, it certainly is odd to trust information from newspapers, books, and Google more than information from the article’s subject’s son.
An interesting page to watch, on this subject, is Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles, which, as the name implies, lists all the people with Wikipedia articles about them, who have publicly announced themselves as editors of Wikipedia. The only people I recognize on the list are Roger Ebert (film critic), Richard Stallman (GNU dude), and, of course, Jimbo Wales.
I’m not entirely convinced that the user Rebert really is Roger Ebert, though. Why would he log in to Wikipedia just to quote himself saying that “turtle” is a comedy word?